Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards

  • Home
  • Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards

We represent clients seeking to enforce foreign arbitral awards in Nepal. Nepal is a party to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, having acceded with both reciprocity and commercial reservations. A foreign award is therefore enforceable here, but only once it clears the conditions set out in Nepal’s own Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999).

The Legal Framework

Reciprocity is the threshold issue in almost every enforcement matter. Nepal enforces a foreign award only if the country where the award was rendered also enforces Nepalese awards. This sounds like a technicality until it decides a case: awards from jurisdictions that have not recognised Nepal as a reciprocating territory have been refused enforcement on that ground alone, while awards from jurisdictions with functioning reciprocity have been recognised. Where an award was made matters as much as what it says.

Beyond reciprocity, the applicant generally needs to show that the award is final and binding under the law of the seat, that it was made under a valid arbitration agreement, and that the losing party received proper notice of the proceedings. Recent amendments to the Arbitration Act restrict Nepalese courts to procedural and jurisdictional review rather than a fresh look at the merits, which narrows the grounds on which enforcement can realistically be resisted.

The Enforcement Process

A party seeking enforcement applies to the High Court with jurisdiction over the award debtor. The application must be supported by the original or a certified copy of the award and of the arbitration agreement, with certified Nepali translations where they were issued in another language. If the High Court is satisfied that the statutory conditions are met, it forwards the award to the District Court, which acts as the court of enforcement and treats the award much like a domestic judgment.

Timing matters. If the award debtor does not comply voluntarily within the statutory period after receiving the award, the creditor has a limited window to file for enforcement, so this is not a process that can be left indefinitely.

What We Do

  • Enforcement applications: preparing and filing before the High Court with the award, agreement and translations in the form the court expects.
  • Reciprocity and jurisdictional analysis: assessing whether reciprocity genuinely exists before advising a client to proceed.
  • Representation through to District Court enforcement: carrying the matter from High Court review to actual execution.
  • Defending against enforcement: opposing enforcement where genuine statutory grounds exist.
  • Annulment and vacatur: representing clients seeking to set aside awards where the statutory grounds are met.

Who We Represent

Award creditors seeking to enforce in Nepal and award debtors seeking to resist enforcement or challenge validity, across cross-border commercial disputes, joint ventures, construction and infrastructure contracts and foreign investment matters.

WhatsApp